Levert avhandling

Da har jeg levert avhand­lin­gen For­enk­lin­gens logikk ved ISS, NTNU. Her er et engelsk sam­men­drag av prosjektet:

The logic of sim­pli­city
A study of the repro­duc­tion of pro­fes­sio­nal iden­tity in ICT organizations

For the past 30 years, infor­ma­tion tech­no­lo­gies and soft­ware have played an impor­tant role in growth and inno­va­tion in modern eco­no­mies. The emer­gence of the “infor­ma­tion age” — the post-industrial society or Inter­net society — has drawn much atten­tion from aca­de­mics who have attemp­ted to describe and the­orize this devel­op­ment. A key argu­ment in these works is that the infor­ma­tion age chan­ges the social pre­requi­si­tes for work and orga­niza­tion. Dif­fe­rent aut­hors have explai­ned know­ledge work as reflecting a network logic, cha­rac­te­rized by large, infor­mal networks, acti­vity, com­mu­ni­ca­tion and con­stant adap­ta­tion. Alt­hough network meta­p­hors are descrip­tive of many aspects of modern know­ledge work, such work also has impor­tant featu­res that can­not be explai­ned in terms of this logic. In the space of 15 years, the pro­gram­ming pro­fes­sion has changed from being associa­ted with flex­ible forms of work and a great deal of over­time to being con­trolled and focu­sed on results. This has taken place wit­hout  stri­kes or trade unions involved. The chan­ges have coin­ci­ded with a strong growth in social cri­ti­cism of ICT and know­ledge work as it unfol­ded in the 1990s from at least three direc­tions: indu­strial effi­ci­ency, the col­lective safety and well-being of the wor­kers, and the growth of mar­kets.  Such cri­ti­cism has gai­ned legi­ti­macy among pro­fes­sio­nals. The com­pro­mise that has devel­o­ped between these cri­ti­ques has emer­ged as a pro­fes­sio­nal ideal rooted in eas­tern cul­ture: sim­pli­city. Accor­ding to this ideal, con­nec­ting to a network, sha­ring awa­re­ness and con­tent and con­tri­bu­ting to the infor­ma­tion flow do not create value, but rat­her lead to com­plex­ity, followed by inef­fi­ci­ency and an unhealthy work/life balance. Pro­fes­sio­nal value is on the other hand created through focu­sing atten­tion and con­cen­tra­ting, tur­ning off e-mail, social media and cell pho­nes. I term this value sys­tem the logic of sim­pli­city or the world of sim­pli­city. This logic guides what is con­side­red fair, and pro­vi­des a means to rank colle­agues, rela­tion­ships, actions and objects. By using sim­pli­city as a hig­her com­mon prin­ciple, indu­strial ideals rela­ting to per­for­mance mana­ge­ment and plan­ning is gai­ning legi­ti­macy in ICT orga­niza­tions. I show how and why this change is unfol­ding through two empi­ri­cal stu­dies. The first is based on a qua­li­ta­tive ana­ly­sis of inter­views with 23 soft­ware devel­opers, and the second is based on a dis­course ana­ly­sis of twelve manuals in agile soft­ware devel­op­ment and pro­ject mana­ge­ment. In the first ana­ly­sis I show how ideals refer­ring to sim­pli­city are used and positio­ned in rela­tion to other impor­tant prin­cip­les of pro­fes­sio­nal prac­tice, while the second ana­ly­sis descri­bes the logic of sim­pli­city in detail. Both ana­ly­ses draw upon and con­tri­bu­tes to the prag­ma­tic fram­ework of social action devel­o­ped by Luc Bol­tanski and Lau­rent Thé­venot. Struc­tu­ral ana­ly­ses is often cri­ti­cized for having func­tio­nal or mecha­ni­cal under­stan­dings of social action. By lin­king the logic of the actors’ under­stan­ding to the con­cept of worth, this fram­ework paint a uni­verse of cul­tural change where social action is dyna­mic and human actors are vivid.

Jeg har vel lenge lurt på hvor­dan det ville føles, og må vel så langt si at det kjen­nes ganske bra ut.

Ingen kommentarer

Legg igjen en kommentar

Din epostadresse vil aldri bli delt med andre.Obligatoriske felt er merket med *